IBM RegTech Ideas Portal

 Welcome!

 

Our team welcomes any feedback and suggestions you have for improving our offerings. This forum allows us to connect your product improvement ideas with IBM product and engineering teams.

 

For product documentation, see Knowledge Center.
Create and View Support Cases and Use the Discussion Forum here

 

Reminder: This is not the place to submit defects or support needs, please use normal support channel for these cases

 

The shorter URL for this site is:   http://ibm.biz/WFS-Ideas

IBMers, please visit the WFSS Internal Ideas portal https://ibm.biz/WFS-Internal-Ideas

 

note: The IBM ICM IDEAS Portal is no longer available at this location. If you have reached this page, please look for a new link in the Varicent Administrator. Direct links are found under the "?" in the upper right corner.
A period of transition is likely to impact this service, while ICM becomes Varicent. Please contact Varicent support if you have additional challenges or concerns.

Display USER_CODE separately on the transmission hierarchy screen.

Sorry for the delay on this. I discussed this with the developer and
also the architect.

We have been calling the DOCUMENT TYPE field the "record id" for awhile.
This is not something that we would want to change. The
USER_CODE being displayed as the "record id" does not make sense.
However, if the USER_CODE does have value to you, we can display it
separately on the transmission hierarchy screen. We would do this as a
feature request (RFE) if you request it.
  • Avatar32.5fb70cce7410889e661286fd7f1897de Guest
  • Apr 5 2019
  • Reviewing
Component Dashboards, Reports, & Insights
Priority Medium - Important
  • Attach files
  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    10 Jan 03:44pm

    Duplicate of FTMCHECK-I-50.  Keeping FTMCHECK-I-47.  Details from FTMCHECK-I-50:

    Record ID value shown as zero in FTM Inbound Transmission Hierarchy page

    The Record Id field in Inbound transmission Hierarchy -> Debit Details -> Check Data is shown as zero. If this field in the UI is the CPCS record id, then it should be corrected. If not, we need the CPCS Record Id (decimal value 0 - 255) field to be displayed as part of the transaction details in the FTM screens. More details are thee in the IBM PMR 85708-442-000.

     Had "1" Vote.