IBM RegTech Ideas Portal



Our team welcomes any feedback and suggestions you have for improving our offerings. This forum allows us to connect your product improvement ideas with IBM product and engineering teams.


For product documentation, see Knowledge Center.
Create and View Support Cases and Use the Discussion Forum here


Reminder: This is not the place to submit defects or support needs, please use normal support channel for these cases


The shorter URL for this site is:

IBMers, please visit the WFSS Internal Ideas portal


note: The IBM ICM IDEAS Portal is no longer available at this location. If you have reached this page, please look for a new link in the Varicent Administrator. Direct links are found under the "?" in the upper right corner.
A period of transition is likely to impact this service, while ICM becomes Varicent. Please contact Varicent support if you have additional challenges or concerns.

Ability to make auto-populated TCR custom advice attributes uneditable and/or hidden

Why is it useful: Because some of the auto-populated fields for advices do not need to appear in adjustments, this will give us better control of what the operator can see.

Who should benefit from it: Balancing operator

How should it work?  Add flags for the CIF User Exit to inspect and hide and/or make the custom advice attribute fields uneditable.

  • Avatar32.5fb70cce7410889e661286fd7f1897de Guest
  • Aug 9 2019
  • Will Not Implement
Component Usability
Priority Medium - Important
  • Attach files
  • Admin
    Craig Rector commented
    15 Sep, 2019 05:12pm

    Thank you Mariko. I will reclassify this Idea to "Will not Implement"

  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    9 Sep, 2019 10:38pm

    9/9/2019 We had a discussion about an internal work around to this enhancement today.  We are going to pursue our internal solution (handle the uneditable fields by the CIF User Exit, remove the fields to be hidden from the DSU workbook and add the required fields to the custom advice XML file to they will be printed on the resulting advice notices), so we will not be needing this enhancement after implementing our internal solution.  Thank you.

    Mariko Arant