IBM RegTech Ideas Portal

 Welcome!

 

Our team welcomes any feedback and suggestions you have for improving our offerings. This forum allows us to connect your product improvement ideas with IBM product and engineering teams.

 

For product documentation, see Knowledge Center.
Create and View Support Cases and Use the Discussion Forum here

 

Reminder: This is not the place to submit defects or support needs, please use normal support channel for these cases

 

The shorter URL for this site is:   http://ibm.biz/WFS-Ideas

IBMers, please visit the WFSS Internal Ideas portal https://ibm.biz/WFS-Internal-Ideas

 

note: The IBM ICM IDEAS Portal is no longer available at this location. If you have reached this page, please look for a new link in the Varicent Administrator. Direct links are found under the "?" in the upper right corner.
A period of transition is likely to impact this service, while ICM becomes Varicent. Please contact Varicent support if you have additional challenges or concerns.

Two pass logic

When a user attempts to delete a record on OpenPages, the system presents them with a pop-up ‘OK' / ‘Cancel'. It's a really good ‘user experience'.

We'd like to implement a similar two-pass logic, and being able to utilise this same approach would be ideal – particularly as all other options I can think of for achieving the same result are much worse.

It would be very useful if the base code (mentioned at the start), could be tightly packaged such that we could call it as a utility using a defined interface.

The input parameters I would expect to see would be
- Object
- Action (update/create/associate etc.)
- Condition (e.g. Object1.Value > Object2.Value)
- Popup wording (e.g. Are you sure you want to enter a date in the past?)
Suggest to keep things simple, that OK & Cancel remain the only two options and OK always means proceed / Cancel means don't

I suspect this needs some restriction to stop it clashing with existing instances of this code (e.g. on delete & dis-associate)
  • Avatar32.5fb70cce7410889e661286fd7f1897de Guest
  • Mar 29 2019
  • Will Not Implement
Component Platform Features
Priority High - Critical
  • Attach files