IBM RegTech Ideas Portal

 Welcome!

 

Our team welcomes any feedback and suggestions you have for improving our offerings. This forum allows us to connect your product improvement ideas with IBM product and engineering teams.

 

For product documentation, see Knowledge Center.
Create and View Support Cases and Use the Discussion Forum here

 

Reminder: This is not the place to submit defects or support needs, please use normal support channel for these cases

 

The shorter URL for this site is:   http://ibm.biz/WFS-Ideas

IBMers, please visit the WFSS Internal Ideas portal https://ibm.biz/WFS-Internal-Ideas

 

note: The IBM ICM IDEAS Portal is no longer available at this location. If you have reached this page, please look for a new link in the Varicent Administrator. Direct links are found under the "?" in the upper right corner.
A period of transition is likely to impact this service, while ICM becomes Varicent. Please contact Varicent support if you have additional challenges or concerns.

Bulk Update Configuration to Exclude Fields and Apply RUles

Provide the ability for administrators to define on a per object basis what fields can be updated in bulk using existing functionality in TFUI. Also, allow rules to specified for fields to be updated I.E. a text 'Risk Title' field needs to be over 50 characters.

  • Avatar32.5fb70cce7410889e661286fd7f1897de Guest
  • May 14 2020
  • Future Consideration
Component End User UI
Priority Medium - Important
  • Attach files
  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    01 Sep 09:40

    Hello Christophe,

    Yes for us it is part of the workflow from endusers to change the status of a risk and also e.g. the risk/ control owner at the same time. At the moment we have no other cases, where we have a need to change any other fields.

    So this would be a very helpful function, if we could adjust the bulk update function this way, that several fields can be "opened" for end users and some may be restricted.

    Hope this helps.

    Eva

  • Admin
    CHRISTOPHE DELAURE commented
    25 Aug 14:16

    Thank you Eva

    In general, do all of you see it at a bulk "Workflow" Action, I want to approve all the follwoing Risk where approve is a workflow action (it might set a status automatically)

    or is there a need for other use cases ?I m thinking of things like " update control owner " or is this more an admin function

    Christophe

  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    25 Aug 13:39

    Hello Christophe,

    Short information about our business:We have more than 2500 users who evaluate more than 7000 risks on a quaterly basis. In one use case we distribute more than 50 risks to more than 200 entities. The users in these entities use the bulk update functionality to change the status of the risks. In 8.1 it was possible to configure the bulk update fields the end user could alter and we would highly appreciate this functionality in 8.2.

    + Now this Bulk Update is of limited use to us / the users, if it is only intended for administrators, who of course can change all fields. Therefore we would be very helpful if we had a version of the Bulk Update optimized for single, limited fields.

    Thank you for feedback.

  • Admin
    CHRISTOPHE DELAURE commented
    20 Aug 17:05

    I was wondering you could share the actual use use case you are looking at

    Here an example

    Who: 1000 users in the business ?

    What: Need to be able to close 1000 Loss Event

    The Bulk update is a powerfull feature, we initially though should only be available to experience users .

    Based on the request, you would like to provide a restricted version for the 1st line

  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    16 Jun 09:54

    Absolutely essential for several reportings within IBM Open pages. Bulk update ensures time saving of at least two days of work for the colleagues in terms of some reportings performed in IBM Open pages. Please add this function, without this function the smooth process of some repotings is at risk.

  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    10 Jun 12:47

    Absoluetly needed for our Business. Please add this function, as we have lots of risks that have to be changed at once.

  • Admin
    JOHN Lundgren commented
    09 Jun 16:00

    Thank you again for submitting this Idea!

    As part of our review, we are requesting more information.

    Please provide use cases of the situations where this would be used.

    Thank you.

  • Admin
    JOHN Lundgren commented
    19 May 16:24

    Thank you for submitting this Idea!

    The IBM team is evaluating this enhancement request. A decision or request for more information will be provided within 90 days.